Horse welfare legislation in Australia

Horse welfare legislation

[General guidelines][Codes of welfare][Surgical/medical procedures]


General legislation guidelines

There are three basic commandments concerning horse ownership.

The children’s classic Black Beauty (1877) was a lone cry in the wilderness by its author, Anna Sewell, for horse welfare reform. It was a fictional story, read and loved by millions since its publication well over a hundred years ago, but it was also a protest against many of the wrong but accepted practices of the time, particularly the use of the bearing rein on carriage horses to make them keep their heads up and look pretty. Some horses were forced to work for hours in these devices, including having to try to pull loads uphill. Of course in modern times there still are dubious devices used on horses to alter their appearance or action, but the bearing rein was particularly cruel and senseless.

Black Beauty was a book well ahead of its time, because it is only in the last few decades that there has been much real public awareness of animal welfare issues, due largely to the communications technology boom and vast improvements in information dissemination and education. Another factor, many people say, is the increasing influence of women in policy making decisions regarding animal welfare. But even in times gone by, very few people had any desire to be deliberately cruel or unkind to animals, except for the “sickos” that have always been in society. Using practices that cause unnecessary distress, discomfort or pain were and still are mainly due to ignorance or extreme lack of concern.

It was once thought that animals do not suffer pain, which of course is totally wrong. Pain is a protective mechanism common to all vertebrates, and even invertebrates use evasion tactics which may or may not be an attempt to avoid or minimise pain - the jury is still out on whether invertebrates feel pain. Pain has a biological cause as well as an emotional response. Anticipating pain makes it worse and animals including horses will not have this emotional response until conditioned to associate certain cues with previous painful experiences. Individual humans and no doubt animals vary in their pain threshold and tolerance of pain, but both parameters are lowered by anxiety and stress. Animals certainly suffer from these emotional states, which they respond to by exhibiting personality changes or developing abnormal behaviours. Some of the abnormal behaviours of the horse under stress have already been discussed, particularly stable vices.

 

Model codes of welfare

 

The commonwealth government department DAFF and many of the states of Australia have model codes of welfare specific to species, some of which cover horses.  While a breach of one of these codes is not an offence in itself, if it causes animal suffering it may become an offence under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The following is based on some of the recommendations made in these codes:

Queensland has no specific separate code for the welfare of horses, although according to the DPI website there is one under development (Nov 2006).  But horses are covered under the Duty of Care provision in Section 17 of the Animal Care and Protection Act 2001. Any person who owns or is in charge of a horse is legally obliged to provide adequately for the animal's needs in regard to –

These provisions must be appropriate to the type, age and circumstances of the animal and according to climatic conditions. Overrugging of horses is a glaring and frequently seen example of inappropriate care in relation to climate. Even in winter in southern Queensland, it is rarely cold enough to leave a heavyweight rug on a horse all day. To do so prevents the evaporation of sweat from the body surface which is how horses cool themselves. Consequently body heat builds up, horses may breathe rapidly (“pant” through the nostrils) in an effort to lose heat, also stand in water if available. They may be soaked with sweat under the rug. Keeping paddock horses adequately fed is far more important than rugging them unless it can be properly managed according to ambient temperature. An exception is clipped horses, they should never be turned out in a paddock in the middle of winter without a rug.

 


  • Surgical/medical procedures and the legislation

    [castration][tail docking][firing and blistering][stomach tubing]

    Castration has been described as the unkindest cut of all and it is certainly the cruellest if not carried out under an anaesthetic. Aside from the cruelty aspects, many horses have died as a result of shock and infection from backyard operators and their dirty pocket knives. In many countries it is illegal to perform any surgery on a horse, including castration, without an anaesthetic or analgesic. In Australia, the welfare codes advise only that horses should not be castrated without the use of an anaesthetic agent, but do not necessarily say it is illegal. However, even if a procedure is not illegal but causes pain and suffering to the animal, then it can become an offence under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. Murkiness is added to the issue however, if horses are classified as farm animals or livestock. Unfortunately the welfare legislation of most countries allows routine husbandry procedures, including castration, to be performed on farm animals without anaesthesia.

    Surgical procedures should be performed and anaesthesia given only by or under the supervision of a qualified veterinary surgeon. It is an offence under The Veterinary Surgeons Act for any person other than a registered vet to perform any surgery on an animal for fee or reward.

    The docking of horses’ tails is now illegal in Australia. There is an ongoing debate in veterinary circles about the efficacies of firing and severe blistering, but those against these practices are winning the argument. Firing is now banned in many countries including New Zealand. In Australia it is banned in New South Wales and other states look likely to follow suit.

    Routine procedures such as the administration of worm pastes and any topical preparations for wound treatment and insect control are all the legitimate domain of the horse owner, but dosing must always be in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

    A final word about that hoary old chestnut - stomach tubing. Some horse owners pride themselves on their ability to stomach tube a horse, but it is a very harmful and dangerous procedure in unskilled hands. Stomach tubing should only ever be used by a veterinarian to treat some specific medical problem. It involves inserting a flexible tube up through one nostril of the horse then through the throat region and down into the oesophagus (food pipe). Fluids can then be poured in via a funnel. It is very easy to get the tube into the trachea (windpipe) instead of the oesophagus, and this can be fatal. Nose bleeds frequently occur due to rough insertion of the tube, also serious damage to the nasal septum requiring corrective surgery. It has been proven that modern wormicides work just as well given in oral paste form rather than by stomach tube, and electrolyte preparations or similar work just as well mixed in the feed or water.

    More horse welfare topics